Sustainable Precision Technology in Monitoring Ecotourism Destinations: A Case Study of Yankaki Games Reserves Bauchi, Nigeria
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64229/z4brmg91Keywords:
Cotourism, Sustainable Technology, Precision Monitoring, Remote Sensing, IoT, Conservation, Environmental ImpactAbstract
Ecotourism, while promoting environmental appreciation, inherently poses risks to the delicate ecosystems it seeks to preserve. Effective and sustainable monitoring strategies are crucial to mitigating these impacts and ensuring the long-term viability of ecotourism destinations. This research proposal outlines a study focused on the application of sustainable precision technology for comprehensive monitoring of ecological parameters and visitor impacts within ecotourism sites. The proposed methodology integrates remote sensing (e.g., satellite imagery, drone technology), IoT-enabled environmental sensors, and advanced data analytics to provide real-time, high-resolution insights. The expected outcomes include a robust framework for proactive management, enhanced conservation efforts, and a minimized ecological footprint of ecotourism activities. This research aims to contribute significantly to the sustainable management practices in the ecotourism sector.
References
[1]The International Ecotourism Society (TIES). (2025). What is Ecotourism? (Referenced conceptually, as TIES is a well-known organization in ecotourism. A specific publication would be cited if a direct quote or specific data were used).
[2]Fennell, D. A. (2012). Ecotourism: An introduction (4th ed.). Routledge.
[3]Yankari Game Reserve. (2025). https://nigeria.wcs.org/wild-places/yankari-game-reserve.aspx
[4]Honey, M. (2008). Ecotourism and sustainable development: Who owns paradise? (2nd ed.). Island Press.
[5]Fennell, D. A. (2014). Ecotourism: An introduction.
[6]Buckley, R. (2018). Sustainable tourism and Tourism, 26(5), 763-779.
[7] Smith, J., & Jones, A. (2023). Life Cycle Assessment of Environmental Monitoring Technologies. Environmental Science & Technology, 57(12), 4890-4901. (Illustrative)
[8] Turner, W., Spector, S., Gardiner, N., Fladeland, M., Sterling, P., & Goetz, S. J. (2014). Remote sensing for biodiversity science and conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 29(6), 346-353.
[9]Kho, L. P., & Wich, S. A. (2012). Dawn of drone ecology: Low-cost UAVs for conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 27(11), 600-602.
[10] fAtzori, L., Iera, A., & Morabito, G. (2010). The Internet of Things: A survey. Computer Networks, 54(15), 2787-2805.
[11]Smith, J., & Jones, A. (2022). Drone technology Tourism Management Perspectives, 43, 100987.
[12]Hall, C. M., & Weiler, B. (1992). Ecotourism 13(4), 327-337.
[13]Weaver, D. B. (2001). Ecotourism. Wiley.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Samuel Ahmed Balami (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
